- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:45:08 +1000
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- CC: Philippe Wittenbergh <ph.wittenbergh@l-c-n.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 22/04/2011 3:16 PM, Simon Fraser wrote: > On Apr 21, 2011, at 8:28 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > >> On Apr 22, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Simon Fraser wrote: >>> I don't think this changes the fact that z-index should not apply to a transformed >>> element (just as 'left' and 'top' do not apply), but I wanted to mention it in case >>> someone disagrees. >> >> I was going to note that (with an absolute pos. child of a transform). But you confuse me. In all UA I've tested (Gecko 1.9.2+, Webkit nightly, Opera 11.10), 'left' and 'top' are applied to the AP child of a transform. > > I think you misunderstand. Those still work. I'm saying that 'left' and 'top' > don't apply to a statically positioned, transformed element. > > Simon Simon, What is a statically positioned transformed element? Do you mean an element with position static that has non been transformed but when transformation happens, it becomes position relative? -- Alan Gresley http://css-3d.org/ http://css-class.com/
Received on Friday, 22 April 2011 06:45:36 UTC