- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:55:02 -0700
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Saturday 2011-04-16 08:24 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > One more question about this behavior (which I don't see the spec > answering): when some of the adjacent pairs of values of a property > aren't animatable, what happens? All the spec says about > non-animatable situations is: > # Properties that are unable to be animated are ignored in these > # rules, with the exception of animation-timing-function', the > # behavior of which is described below. > -- http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-animations/#keyframes The behavior I implemented for now is that if some of the pairs of values for a property aren't animatable, I drop the property from the animation (even if some of the pairs of values are animatable). This seemed like the most reasonable behavior I could come up with, at least until we have animation of non-interpolable properties. (In this model, dropping a single segment feels much wierder since each property has its own set of segments, though I suppose it's an option.) -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Friday, 22 April 2011 01:55:29 UTC