On Saturday 2011-04-16 08:24 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > One more question about this behavior (which I don't see the spec > answering): when some of the adjacent pairs of values of a property > aren't animatable, what happens? All the spec says about > non-animatable situations is: > # Properties that are unable to be animated are ignored in these > # rules, with the exception of animation-timing-function', the > # behavior of which is described below. > -- http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-animations/#keyframes The behavior I implemented for now is that if some of the pairs of values for a property aren't animatable, I drop the property from the animation (even if some of the pairs of values are animatable). This seemed like the most reasonable behavior I could come up with, at least until we have animation of non-interpolable properties. (In this model, dropping a single segment feels much wierder since each property has its own set of segments, though I suppose it's an option.) -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/Received on Friday, 22 April 2011 01:55:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:59 UTC