- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:20:46 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 04/20/2011 07:59 PM, Koji Ishii wrote: > Looks almost good to me. A few comments follow. > >> 6. Simplify: >> * For informal styles, for any group with a value between ten >> and nineteen, remove the digit before the tens marker. > > For Chinese informal style only, as Japanese and Korean are covered by > the next item. Doing this doesn't harm though. Yeah. I could go either way. >> * For the Japanese and Korean informal styles, if any of >> the digit markers are preceded by the digit 1, and that digit >> is not the first digit of the group, remove the digit, leaving >> only the marker. > > Just to clarify the possible ambiguity, "For the Japanese informal > and Korean informal" works better for me. There was an error to apply > this to Japanese formal style as well in Murakami-san's e-mail[1] and > then it was corrected in the attachment file of this e-mail[2]. Works for me. >> 7. Collapse (across groups) any consecutive runs of 0 digits into >> * nothing, for Japanese >> * a single _zero digit_, for Chinese >> [Add appropriate prose for Korean] > > This should be: > > 7. Collapse (across groups) > * any 0 digits into nothing for Japanese > * any consecutive runs of 0 digits into a single _zero digit_ for Chinese They both actually result in the same thing. I think the original one makes it clearer what the difference is, since there's more parallel structure. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2011 03:21:17 UTC