- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:39:21 -0700
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > Le 20/04/11 01:55, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : > >> 7. Are Aegean (U+10107-10133), Shavian (U+10450-1047F), and Ugaritic >> (U+10380-1039D) things I should address? I dunno if these are living >> or dead scripts. > > > Aegean and Ugaritic are extinct. Scholars wanting to include sections > of a document using those scripts are not :-) But I never saw a list > numbered in Ugaritic on a tablet or anything else. > Apparently, Ugaritic numbers were usually written as words (3 = > "three"). > > Aegean is more problematic since it does have glyphs for numbers and > those appeared in artifacts. > > Shavian is a recently constructed script for English. I have never ever > seen a live example of shavian script nor have I ever met anyone able > to write/read it. Okay, I was just checking if they were currently-living languages. Dead, scholarly, or constructed languages can be done by the author defining a @counter-style of their own. I won't add them to the default style sheet, then. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2011 18:40:08 UTC