- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 21:12:01 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tab Atkins Jr.
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 2:03 PM
>
> Currently, the Grid draft uses the 'fr' unit to denote an absolute-flex
> unit. I previously just had a 'fl' unit in the Flexbox draft that did the
> same thing. Do we want to standardize on one of these ('fr' is fine with
> me), and then use the approach I've quoted, which is optimized for
> relative flex?
Are you suggesting using 'fr' as "absolute flex" (or "fraction", which is consistent with other use) and 'fl' for "relative flex" (as in original 'box-flex' property)? I think it was proposed before and rejected but somehow today it sounds sensible......
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 21:12:30 UTC