- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 10:38:52 -0700
- To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- CC: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 04/07/2011 08:51 PM, Koji Ishii wrote: > >> I'm not convinced it makes sense to set these types of >> values in a style sheet. For example, what does it mean >> to say: >> >> <p style="text-justify: inter-cluster">候选</p> >> >> It seems more natural to describe "justification opportunities" >> between various types of characters. That's *exactly* what 'text-justify' does. If that's not clear, please suggest how it can be made more clear. :) > Your example doesn't make sense since you're using the value for > clustered scripts such as Thai against Chinese, which is not a > clustered script. > > This is an interesting point though. I'm not sure what the difference > between 'inter-ideograph' and 'inter-cluster'. The spec says the > difference is "inter-graphemic boundary" or "grapheme cluster boundary". > I'm not familiar with the former terminology, nor I can find it in UAX #29. Fixed. >> What's a typical use case for 'each-line'? > > I'm sorry that I don't have answers to this question. Fantasai? Poetry or code. I write a line of code like this. I add another one like this. But if the line gets way too long, it should indent so what I meant does not get misinterpreted. >> 'hanging' may be useful, but the name doens't sound right to me >> -- the result isn't always a hanginge first line. Isn't 'invert' better? > > I'm okay with this. Anyone else? No opinion. 'hanging' was added ages ago; I think that was just the best keyword hixie and I could come up with. >> About the 'hanging-puctuation' property: >> >> - it seems that an ending quote cannot hang? > > Correct. See the picture at Wikipedia: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanging_punctuation > If you have use case for an ending quote to hang, I'd be happy to know. We had a 'last' value in the previous WD, and asked for use cases at the F2F, but nobody had any so we dropped it. >> I suggest we remove the 'text-outline' property -- 'text-shadow' >> should cover it. > > I don't have answer to this question, sorry again -- fantasai? I have no problem with that. It was even marked as a suggestion in the draft already. ;) ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 17:39:22 UTC