- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:20:22 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 4/7/11 8:43 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > We have also run into this problem in our discussion of > XBL2/Component use-cases, and in fact already use essentially this > concept in our Component implementation - the root of a shadow tree is > implemented as an element, but it doesn't appear in the box tree. That's quite different from the problem Lachlan is talking about. What you're saying is that the root of the shadow tree does not appear in the final flattened tree at all, which is true. What Lachlan wants is things that appear in the final flattened tree but do not generate boxes of their own; their children's boxes are just placed in their parent instead. -Boris
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 20:24:52 UTC