- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 11:45:22 -0700
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: > On 2011-04-07 16:52, Lachlan Hunt wrote: >> >> For this, one solution we came up with was a new value for 'display' >> that means to not generate a layout box for the element, but to still >> render the child content within as if the element itself wasn't there. >> >> display: transparent; > > Apparently some people are confused by the use of the term transparent. > Something like 'no-box' might be better. 'transparent' tracks perfectly with the HTML concept of a 'transparent' content model, which is why I liked it so much. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 18:46:10 UTC