- From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 17:52:09 -0400
- To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp> wrote: > Your use case is interesting, but I'd also be surprised if the following two actions produced different results. > * Apply underline to "bar baz quz" and then remove underline from "baz" > * Apply underline to "bar" of "bar baz quz", and then to "quz" Yeah, I've pretty much concluded that CSS underlining is a basket case from the perspective of WYSIWYG. There's just no way to square it with what users will expect without rewriting how it works, which is unlikely to be worth the effort. I've just given up on getting tricky cases right for WYSIWYG underline/line-through. Maybe we can think about it at some future date.
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2011 21:53:29 UTC