- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 15:03:52 -0400
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: "塩澤 元 (Shiozawa, Hajime)" <hajime.shiozawa@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
No, it's not written yet, sorry. What I wrote below is based on my discussion with fantasai and therefore it's not official, but I think it is the correct behavior. I understand we have a resource issue to make the spec progress. I hope to use my time on it once CSS3 Text and Writing Modes get more stabilized, but I can't promises when it will be right now. Regards, Koji -----Original Message----- From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbarsky@MIT.EDU] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 3:52 AM To: Koji Ishii Cc: "塩澤 元 (Shiozawa, Hajime)"; www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: [css3-ruby] block elements inside <ruby> and wrapping inside <rb>. On 4/3/11 2:41 PM, Koji Ishii wrote: >> That doesn't answer the question. >> What should a UA do if the author does put a block-level element >> inside ruby text? > > Sorry for not being clear. I wanted to write that UA should put an > anonymous inline-level box if rb element is omitted, so that the block > element is placed within the ruby base of ruby box model[1] But the ruby box model doesn't explain what to do with a block child of ruby-base as far as I can tell. Am I just missing it? -Boris
Received on Sunday, 3 April 2011 19:05:48 UTC