- From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 02:02:24 +0000
- To: "www-style@gtalbot.org" <www-style@gtalbot.org>, Glenn Linderman <v+html@g.nevcal.com>
- CC: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
That's not what I said either. Note that I didn't reference CSS, much less CSS 2.1, directly. My general point is that if people spent as much of their fire on test writing as they do on workarounds the ecosystem would get better very quickly. That said, since you brought it up... Not to take anything away from it the test suite, but 9418 is "round-off error" small compared to the number of pages on the web and the number of cases that each page represents. And that's just today's pages. Not tomorrow's pages that people like Glenn are working on now. - Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: "Gérard Talbot" [mailto:www-style@gtalbot.org] > Le Ven 1 avril 2011 2:04, Brian Manthos a écrit : > > Alan hits on a good point here. IMO, one of the weakest points in the > > interoperability story right now is the lack of tests. > There is right now 9418 testcases in the latest version of CSS 2.1 test suite > [RC6]. I would not say that the weakest point of CSS 2.1 test suite is the lack > of tests.
Received on Saturday, 2 April 2011 02:02:59 UTC