- From: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:34:15 +1000
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 22:35:06 UTC
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 9/21/10 2:17 PM, Simon Fraser wrote: > >> I agree. I'd expect one of two behaviors for rotated inline elements. The >> first would be "slab" rotation, where all parts of the element are rotated >> on a plane (with some center point that we'd specify, probably the center of >> the bounding box of the parts of the span). The second would be that the >> rotation is applied per line, somehow. >> > > Both of these really do look pretty weird with bidi text (for example, it's > pretty easy to end up with a situation where the boxes on a line are: > > XXXX YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY XXXX > > where the Xs belong to one span and the Ys to another. When applying a > transform to the X span, things would look pretty odd. > > Maybe that's just a cost of supporting both bidi reordering across inline > element boundaries and sufficiently rich styling of inline elements. I > guess borders look pretty weird too, in that situation. That certainly would look weird, but I don't think it's any weirder than the current Gecko behavior. More importantly, I think web developers would understand what was going on here (to the extent that anyone understands bidi!) and not have difficulty coming up with a workaround. Ojan
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 22:35:06 UTC