- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:57:55 -0700
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > Le 20/09/10 17:05, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : > >> That said, there was a recent thread about this, where fantasai >> suggested switching to bearing angles (0deg points North, CW is >> positive). I'm not particularly happy with this, but it does align >> the usage with rotations in general, and with the few other properties >> that actually use an angle as a direction. So I'll be switching it in >> the next draft. > > Before switching in the draft, I would like to hear from implementors. > Linear gradients, under one form or another, are already shipped :-/ Someone needs to keep up on their list traffic. ^_^ This had already been discussed, and roc (who implemented gradients in Moz) is cool with the change. And yeah, like Anne said, there's a reason we use vendor prefixes. ^_^ ~TJ
Received on Monday, 20 September 2010 15:58:47 UTC