Re: Enhancing grouping of selectors

On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:36:58 +0200, Paul Duffin <pduffin@volantis.com>  
wrote:
> Assuming my original assumption that ":not(S)" is the set that contains  
> every element not in the set "S" then:
>     ":not(a.foo)" = ":not(a), :not(.foo)"

Indeed, sorry about that. I should stay out of :not() debates.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Sunday, 19 September 2010 16:50:29 UTC