- From: Lobotom Dysmon <lobotom.da.dismon@free.fr>
- Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 09:49:51 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
About *CSS Backgrounds and Borders Module Level 3* - *Working Draft 12 June 2010* Hi, reading through the background and border module I came across the following things that I believe are mistakes in the text/editing of the document. I intend to also mention things that could be considered lacks in the content/explanations (in all the humility of my opinion). This may seem off topic but I truly don't purpose to discuss the specification itself, merely pointing at the content of a certain version. - in 4.4. The ‘border-radius’ properties Prose specifies the meaning of border-radius values for the case of values being given before and after the slash, and for the case of no slash being used. I believe it makes quite unclear what behavior is induced when a slash is used but followed by no value: wether this is illegal syntax, or as for border-*-radius the second value is copied from the first. - 4.4.4. Overlapping Curves In Example XXII a line goes like this: "/The height (2.5em) is enough for the specified radii (0.5em plus *2.5em*)./" My math and more importantly the rest of the example clearly states height (2.5 em) is equal to 0.5em plus 2.0em (not 2.5em). - In Example XXIV ".../is equivalent to the set of four rules shown after it/:" is followed by a list of _five_ rules. - 5.5. The ‘border-image-repeat’ property In the summary box, 'space' is not listed as a possible value for the property. - Example XXIX A simple type, introduction line for the example reads : "/Below are some examples of an orange box with a blue border being *being* given a drop shadow." ...One "being/" to many Hoping this brings more benefit than trouble. Lobotom Dysmon
Received on Sunday, 19 September 2010 07:50:07 UTC