W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Enhancing grouping of selectors

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:21:05 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimq7-Ewv0DtJ9wTqw8hzkdtTn6pTzELn-om8V3O@mail.gmail.com>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Cc: Matthew Millar <mattmill30@hotmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:18 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
> On Friday 2010-09-17 08:03 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> This runs into issues with scoping.  From what it looks like, your &
>> combinator only lets you group together selectors that form a single
>> element (that is, no element of the group can have any other
>> combinators).  :any() lets you group arbitrary selectors together.
> What I implemented in Gecko is without combinators, actually.
> It wouldn't be particularly hard to implement (though it makes the
> specificity issue in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/thread.html#msg263
> a little more complicated).  It might make the selectors a good bit
> harder to read, though.

Yeah, the :any() pseudoclass is a much better solution to the problem overall.

Received on Friday, 17 September 2010 20:21:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:49:47 UTC