- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:03:02 -0700
- To: Matthew Millar <mattmill30@hotmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Matthew Millar <mattmill30@hotmail.com> wrote: > One thought i had was it'd be easier to treat it as an array, because then > its more inline with other languages [element1, element2, element3]. > Although obviously this is already used for attributes, so thats out of the > question. > > For ease, maybe an alternative to () to consider is &. I think its easier to > read. > > element1 & element2 > subelement1 > subsubelement1 & subsubelement2 This runs into issues with scoping. From what it looks like, your & combinator only lets you group together selectors that form a single element (that is, no element of the group can have any other combinators). :any() lets you group arbitrary selectors together. > Considering internationalisation, is () more common than & on keyboards? CSS already uses () in several places, so this wouldn't introduce any further problems. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 17 September 2010 15:03:56 UTC