- From: Alexis Shaw <alexis.shaw@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 19:02:13 +1000
- To: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 17 September 2010 09:02:45 UTC
I understand that. not a problem. On 17 September 2010 18:44, Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>wrote: > Alexis Shaw: > > On 17 September 2010 18:10, Alexis Shaw <alexis.shaw@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I mean that the definition needs to be able to have more than 256 > possible > >> values, more like 10000 possible values > > > > 256 values is not enough, as the color space would be compressed. > > Percentages are not <integer> ‘%’, but <number> ‘%’. So, by design, they do > support to write much more than 101 distinct values, even more than 10000. > How many distinction a user agent or some graphics framework can handle is > out of scope for CSS. There is no 1-byte-per-component limit in CSS except > for some of the RGB color notation and that is historic baggage. > > For example, “rgb(80%, 48.5%, 12.5787587%)” works just fine today, even if > it results in exactly the same color value as “rgb(204, 124, 32)”. >
Received on Friday, 17 September 2010 09:02:45 UTC