- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:59:24 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:20 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > The CSS2.1 spec says that text-indent percentages are relative to the > containing > block width, not the block element's width. I guess the goal was to allow > use of > margins + negative text indent for hanging indents, but this has some > rather... > odd implications for inline blocks and table cells. > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"> > <title>Blank page</title> > <style> > body { > border: dotted thin silver; > } > table { > border-spacing: 0; > } > .test { width: 100px; text-indent: 50%; border: solid thin gray} > </style> > <table> > <tr> <td class="test">T > </table> > <p><span class="test" style="display: inline-block">T</span> I'll note that Opera is the only browser that actually pays attention to that line for table-cells. Everyone else gives the <td> a text-indent of 50px. Same with padding. Perhaps everyone else treats table cells as containing blocks for their content? > Given that padding behaves the same way, though, perhaps it's best to define > the containing block of a table cell by splitting the table cell into two > boxes at the padding edge and having the outer one be the containing block > for the inner one. Something in this direction is necessary. No comment about the specific fix you're suggesting, but when we have webkit/gecko/ie all agreeing on a rendering, we should probably be fixing CSS to match it. > And I'm wondering whether CSS3, which has explicit support for hanging > indents, should allow for using percentages of the element's width rather > than that of its containing block. Yeah, we should. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2010 21:00:18 UTC