W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2010

Re: [css3-fonts] @font-face matching and font-style descriptor

From: Christopher Slye <cslye@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:58:23 -0700
CC: www-style <www-style@w3.org>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FFC66F62-707E-4B99-83B1-75E241C2EEC7@adobe.com>
To: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
Well, FWIW, when I see an <em> tag, I mentally think "italic or bold". I agree that it's a mistake to assume anything specific about it, and I think different locales should do whatever is appropriate. Still, I think most HTML clients are going to be applying italic, and bold as runner-up.


On Sep 13, 2010, at 8:33 PM, John Hudson wrote:

> Unless otherwise specified in the CSS, e.g. for writing systems for 
> which there is no 'italic' tradition or for which slanted text is not 
> part of standard typography, in which case 'em' might be represented by 
> weight variance, some other secondary style or even, as in traditional 
> German fraktur typography, by a increase in letterspacing.
> The presumption that em = italic is quite eurocentric.
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2010 03:58:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:49:47 UTC