- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 18:16:47 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "Belov, Charles" <Charles.Belov@sfmta.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:58 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > Speaking of which, Tab, we need some way of indicating in the counter() > argument to use the correct numbering type associated with a particular > counter instance. And some way of associating a counter instance with > a numbering type. (I'd suggest using the list-style-type property somehow. > Not sure how.) Because outlining styles that aren't all decimal would > be hard to handle correctly otherwise. > > 1 > 1.a > 1.b > 1.b.i > 1.b.ii > 1.b.iii > 1.b.iv > 2 > 2.a > 2.b > 2.c Ah, right, didn't even consider that that was a problem. Yeah, probably what should happen is that when a counter-reset happens (establishing a new counter scope) it should grab the list-style-type of the element that's doing the reset, and associate it with the newly-created counter. Then if you don't specify a list-type in the counter() or counters() function, it just uses the counter's associated list-style. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 9 September 2010 01:17:39 UTC