W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2010

Re: [css3-images] Linear gradients feedback

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:22:29 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimg4r11mvU7rRax0cAYq44vro8eMUPiPX+3H-6u@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:
> It's for ease of author understanding. It's easier to say "only functions of the same
> time can be interpolated" than "a linear-gradient using an angle cannot be interpolated
> with a linear-gradient that doesn't use one", especially if we fall into the "angle" or
> "non-angle" variants in non-obvious cases.

What non-obvious cases do you think there are?  Unless I've
*seriously* screwed something up the mapping should be trivial - if
there's an angle it's an angle gradient, if there's not it's not.

Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 18:23:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:49:47 UTC