- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:34:29 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sep 7, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:50 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> We seem to have multiple notions of how angles should work. >> >> >> >> Bearing Angle Method: >> - Used for compass bearings >> - Zero degrees points north/up >> - Angles increase clockwise >> - Used by the following properties: >> azimuth (CSS2) >> glyph-orientation (SVG, XSL) >> image-orientation (Paged Media) >> >> > > Argh, I was hoping I could avoid this, but it seems like I maybe can't. ;_; > > Anybody have any strong objection to me switching the <angle> > reference to Bearing Angles? Not I, but it's a shame that an angle of zero will go up, rather than down, making it a less than useful default combined with a starting point of 'top'. Simon
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2010 22:35:18 UTC