- From: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 07:12:46 +1000
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
All done: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-3d-transforms/ Dean On 08/09/2010, at 6:54 AM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: >> From: Simon Fraser [mailto:smfr@me.com] > > >> As I mentioned in another mail, an implementation with only 2D >> transform support should implement CSSMatrix as described in the 2D >> spec. An implementation with 3D transform support should implement >> CSSMatrix with properties and methods from both specifications. Advice >> on how to clarify this in the specs is welcome. > > It would definitely be helpful to call this out explicitly. > One option would be to have CSS2DMatrix and have CSS3DMatrix implement > the former. > > I think I'd prefer to have CSS3 3D Transforms extend CSSMatrix by: > > - Renaming 8.1. to 'Extensions to CSSMatrix' > - Use WebIDL as CSSOM-View and add [Supplemental] to your interface > declaration > - Link back to the CSS3 2D Transforms definition e.g. before the interface: > "The following interface extends the CSSMatrix interface definition specified > in the CSS3 2D Transforms module". > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2010 21:13:24 UTC