- From: Biju <bijumaillist@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 03:17:44 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > You're reading that incorrectly. I very much understood it from your previous mail. Also understood you meant result of the expression is starting from 1, and you are right. But that is only a part of it. When you look at the whole process a CSS programmer has to write that expression. When he design, to predict the effect he has to substitute value for the "n" in the expression, which has values 0,1,2,3,4,n-1. just like any mathematical series we studied in the college. So we have introduced the CSS programmer the concept of ordinal starting with 0 even in the nth-child() All I am saying is, in CSS we can zero based things at many place. So it is better if "[]" the array notation in CSS match the same way we do in JavaScript Cheers
Received on Saturday, 4 September 2010 07:18:20 UTC