- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:51:16 -0700
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: >> Glazou reminded me in a tweet of another good reason that we should >> strive to keep the different-behaving functions separate: the CSS OM. >> We need to design gradients such that the properties exposed in the OM >> are sensible, and behave predictably under modification. > > That's convincing. We just need a name, then. I'm hoping I can do > this without resorting to "linear2-gradient()"... Maybe just angle-gradient()? Not sure how happy I am with that, but it's the best I've been able to come up with. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 3 September 2010 17:52:11 UTC