W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2010

Re: [css3-images] Linear gradients feedback

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:51:16 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikSbV5n-TOButOBpV3Ja+LaQGC_E4UkqxFHeXHx@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:
>> Glazou reminded me in a tweet of another good reason that we should
>> strive to keep the different-behaving functions separate: the CSS OM.
>> We need to design gradients such that the properties exposed in the OM
>> are sensible, and behave predictably under modification.
> That's convincing.  We just need a name, then.  I'm hoping I can do
> this without resorting to "linear2-gradient()"...

Maybe just angle-gradient()?  Not sure how happy I am with that, but
it's the best I've been able to come up with.

Received on Friday, 3 September 2010 17:52:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:49:47 UTC