On 09/01/2010 09:45 PM, Brad Kemper wrote: > In Backgrounds & Borders, we have this about basing the > border-image-width on the border-width: > > <number> > Numbers represent multiples of the corresponding border-width > <http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#the-border-width>.[1] > > Should we also say that if a number is used and the 'border-style' is > 'none' or 'hidden', then the resulting border-image-width is zero? Or > perhaps we should just say "Numbers represent multiples of the computed > value of the corresponding border-width." I think that is the intent, > right? So that layout geometry is the same in the fallback situation? Good catch. Fixed thusly: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/csswg/css3-background/Overview.src.html.diff?r1=1.239&r2=1.240&f=h Let me know if it's good. ~fantasaiReceived on Thursday, 2 September 2010 05:22:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:50 UTC