- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:37:08 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 09/01/2010 11:02 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > I'm just trying to avoid weirdnesses caused by defining this in an > image-specific way right now. The Values& Units version of it would > just define it generally in syntax terms and then Image Values would > define what it means as an<image>, just like how the two of them work > together on the url() function. Actually that does make more sense. :) ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 1 September 2010 21:37:45 UTC