On 9/1/10 3:19 PM, Lea Verou wrote: > Oh, right. As things currently stand, I guess it should be a parse error > then (in the 2nd case), unless a type is explicitly specified. Ah... are we using "type" to mean two different things here, perhaps? I had assumed you were talking about types of attributes as defined in the markup language spec (e.g. HTML does this for various attributes). Are you talking about some other type? -BorisReceived on Wednesday, 1 September 2010 19:22:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:50 UTC