- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:21:25 -0400
- To: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
On 9/1/10 3:19 PM, Lea Verou wrote: > Oh, right. As things currently stand, I guess it should be a parse error > then (in the 2nd case), unless a type is explicitly specified. Ah... are we using "type" to mean two different things here, perhaps? I had assumed you were talking about types of attributes as defined in the markup language spec (e.g. HTML does this for various attributes). Are you talking about some other type? -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 1 September 2010 19:22:01 UTC