W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2010

Re: [css3-transitions] In transition-property: all, <property>, is <property> a duplicate ?

From: Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:03:47 -0700
Message-id: <8FBA40B2-F6AA-4519-9C49-37A6DA05890D@apple.com>
Cc: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>

On Oct 27, 2010, at 2:01 PM, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:

> On Wednesday 2010-10-27 20:33 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote:
>>> From: Chris Marrin [mailto:cmarrin@apple.com]
>>> On Oct 27, 2010, at 1:21 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday 2010-10-27 13:17 -0700, Chris Marrin wrote:
>>>>> If so, then the rule would be that a 'none' in the list would turn
>>>>> off transitions on all properties. The corresponding duration
>>>>> would be ignored. An 'all' would turn transitions on for all
>>>>> properties and would set their duration to the corresponding one.
>>>>> Specific property names later in the list would override these.
>>>>> That seems like the most logical rule to me.
>>>> Are you're saying you'd want an occurrence of 'none' to override
>>>> values earlier/later in the list, or just that 'none' would trigger
>>>> transitions on no properties (and thus cause an item in the
>>>> duration/timing-function/delay lists to be skipped)?
>>> I mean that if you were to say:
>>>    transition-property: width, none, height;
>>>    transition-duration: 1s, 1000000s, 2s;
>>> you'd get a transition just on height and it would occur over 2s.
>>> Similarly, if you say:
>>>    transition-property: width, none, all, height;
>>>    transition-duration: 1s, 2s, 3s, 4s;
>>> you'd get a transition of 3s on all properties except height, which
>>> would transition over 4s.
>> That is my expectation as well i.e. none/all override all the transitions
>> that come before them in the property list. Subsequent properties can
>> then declare expections to none/all. 
>> And if you have 'none,none' or 'all,all', normal dupe handling also
>> happens so the last one wins.
> I'd have expected that overriding for 'all', since it "matches" all
> properties, and the last one wins, but I wouldn't have expected that
> overriding for 'none' since it matches no properties.

Hmm. I've always thought of 'none' as meaning "I don't want anything to animate". But I get your interpretation from a CSS matching standpoint. I guess it could go either way. But I do like the symmetry of my interpretation. 

With your interpretation 'none' would simply be a placeholder and would never affect the set of transitions. That could be useful. I would be fine with either interpretation. 

Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2010 23:04:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:49:50 UTC