- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:31:28 -0700
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: > From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] >> Oh, I *completely* misunderstood what you were trying to communicate >> with your examples, and I'm certain that dbaron did as well. Your >> example (b), if actually typed by an author, has identical behavior to >> (a), so neither of us really understood what distinction you were >> trying to make, and just went for the one that was more technically >> correct, where the shorthand was fully expanded. >> >> I never suspected you were trying to assert something different, that >> (b) implied that border-right-width was being transitioned twice by >> the same rule. I don't even know what that would *mean*. > > From his latest clarification, I think David understood it but that's > not the issue. The important point is that yes, a) is what is specified > and makes sense but not all implementations agree. > > For an idea of what that could mean, hover on the box in the attached > testcase in Chrome 7. Observe how the short border-right-width transition > is triggered several times throughout the much longer border-width > transition. If you don't collapse duplicates I'd definitely expect something > like this to happen. > > I have no honest idea why anyone would want this behavior but it's good > to know it's not just me :) Okay, the Chrome 7 behavior is super weird and dumb. That is definitely not what's supposed to happen. I'll note that actually duplicating a property works like it's supposed to. We're just not correctly handling shorthand expansion. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2010 00:32:21 UTC