- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 09:20:54 -0700
- To: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
- Cc: Célian Veyssière <celian.veyssiere@yahoo.fr>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Oct 10, 2010, at 7:11 AM, timeless wrote:
>>> a {
>>> background-position: 0 0;
>>> }
>>> a:hover {
>>> background-position: unchanged -50px;
>>> }
>>> a:visited {
>>> background-position: unchanged -100px;
>>> }
>
> personally, i'd want "inherit" instead of "unchanged" since "inherit"
> exists in css today.
> (this isn't an endorsement for the proposal.)
It exists, and it means something entirely different from what was proposed.
Received on Sunday, 10 October 2010 16:21:30 UTC