W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2010

aspect-ratio property

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:43:45 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTik8G1kXVu+awAv=tubDrx_5EcDOeCrreH3KRUhN@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
So, we talked about aspect-ratio a little while ago.  There was
general agreement that it sounded like a pretty cool idea, but then
nobody took it farther, probably because it doesn't have a good home,
seeing as Box Model 3 is dead at the moment.

I've taken the liberty of drafting up a spec for it, for discussion
and possible later incorporation into another module -

I don't have the language quite right yet, I know.  I want to disallow
it on table* elements right now, because resolution of it should be up
to the table-layout algo in play.  Generally, I just want it only
defined on things in static or positioned flow.  How do I phrase it
correctly to state that?  I also need to expand my definition of
"underspecified" to properly handle positioned elements, where
left/right/top/bottom comes into play as well.

Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2010 18:44:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:51 UTC