W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2010

Re: [css3-transitions] Interpolating 'other' value types

From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:25:05 -0800
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-id: <25A3B1EF-D5FF-421C-B8DD-0519CC1CA656@me.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On Nov 30, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> Right now, the Transitions spec still says that only certain types of
> values can be transitioned.  Other types of values are ignored (merely
> kept in the transition-property list to maintain relative list
> positions).
> I thought we'd agreed to let any property without specified transition
> rules transition, with the rule that it's equal to the start value at
> t=0 and the end value at t>0 (or the opposite, whatever)?  Part of the
> reason we introduced the step timing-function was specifically to help
> control this case, if I recall correctly.
> I assume this is just a temporary omission, and the necessary edits
> will be made in time?

David Baron suggested that transition-delay should apply to all properties.
I said that I supported that in principle, but was worried about implementation
performance implications, given that the default for transition-property is "all".

Stepwise timing functions would give authors even more control over when
discrete transitions occur, but only for single-step functions. I'm OK with
allowing this to affect non-animatable properties.

So I think we're left needing to add some words to the spec, and getting some

Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 23:25:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:41 UTC