- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:25:05 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Nov 30, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > Right now, the Transitions spec still says that only certain types of > values can be transitioned. Other types of values are ignored (merely > kept in the transition-property list to maintain relative list > positions). > > I thought we'd agreed to let any property without specified transition > rules transition, with the rule that it's equal to the start value at > t=0 and the end value at t>0 (or the opposite, whatever)? Part of the > reason we introduced the step timing-function was specifically to help > control this case, if I recall correctly. > > I assume this is just a temporary omission, and the necessary edits > will be made in time? David Baron suggested that transition-delay should apply to all properties. I said that I supported that in principle, but was worried about implementation performance implications, given that the default for transition-property is "all". Stepwise timing functions would give authors even more control over when discrete transitions occur, but only for single-step functions. I'm OK with allowing this to affect non-animatable properties. So I think we're left needing to add some words to the spec, and getting some implementations. Simon
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 23:25:40 UTC