- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:56:33 -0800
- To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com>
- Cc: Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com> wrote: >> I'll leave this to the browser vendors to decide. If this is indeed cheap, then we can relax the restriction on image-orientation. > It seems logical to add it. It could even be expressed as a 2d-transform. There's already background-origin parameter to indicate where the rotation/skewing should take place. Like I said, I'll wait for implementors to tell me if it's reasonable or not. ^_^ If it is, I have no problem changing it. >> Could you screencap some images for me? > I harvested a couple of ads with this idiom but I'm unsure if I can post them for IP reasons... Seriously? Dude, it doesn't matter. For one, who cares, and for two, it's clearly Fair Use in the US. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 20:57:27 UTC