- From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:31:05 +0100
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:22:23 +0100, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 11/24/10 11:42 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug wrote: >> "For each 'table-cell' box C in a sequence of consecutive internal table >> and 'table-caption' siblings, if C's parent is not a 'table-row' then >> generate an anonymous 'table-row' box around C and all consecutive >> siblings of C that are 'table-cell' boxes." >> >> So... >> - is "C's parent" actually referring to a link in the formatting >> structure? > > Yes. > > > If so, where is the table-caption's box located at this point >> in time > > It's a child of the table box. The assumption is that this algorithm is > run once all the rest of the formatting tree construction work has > happened. But presumably, then, that tree construction work has generated some sort of intermediate structure that mostly resembles the DOM tree, and e.g. the table-caption is not yet put in the proper place outside the table box. > That should perhaps be made clearer. > >> is it a "consecutive sibling" or not? > > Yes. I suspected as much, but yes, I think this stuff should be stated explicitly (which, I'm sure, is easier said than done). -- Øyvind Stenhaug Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2010 19:29:48 UTC