- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:08:02 +0000
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Bingo. Then I'm happy to leave it be. Thanks ! > -----Original Message----- > From: L. David Baron [mailto:dbaron@dbaron.org] > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 8:12 AM > To: Sylvain Galineau > Cc: robert@ocallahan.org; Brad Kemper; www-style@w3.org > Subject: Re: [css3-backgrounds] Should a non-zero border-radius create > a new stacking context ? > > On Tuesday 2010-11-23 14:58 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > > They already have this same side-effect with opacity and > > transforms. Hence my asking for evidence that it *is* an issue, > > especially with opacity which is very popular. I'm not that > > interested in worrying about side-effects if no one runs into them > > outside test suites. > > Some evidence that authors are confused by the z-ordering behavior > of opacity: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401682 > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573421 > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598984 > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2837057/what-has-bigger-priority- > opacity-or-z-index-in-browsers > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2940997/how-to-get-z-index-to-play- > nice-with-the-jquery-plugin-cycle > > -David > > -- > L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ > Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2010 00:08:37 UTC