- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 19:57:23 -0800
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 20 November 2010 03:58:46 UTC
On Nov 19, 2010, at 6:19 pm, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > It's more composition work. > > I'm not sure what you're saying though: is being consistent with inexplicability a goal ? Or are you saying that a new stacking context should be created even when border-radius is 0 ? The latter would be a much larger and likely breaking change for the web. One could certainly argue that it's disruptive to change z-ordering as a result of rounding a corner but we do that for opacity for reasons that are not so explicable to authors. On the flip side, we don't do it for overflow, which is very counter-intuitive (and adds greatly to implementation complexity). Simon
Received on Saturday, 20 November 2010 03:58:46 UTC