- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:52:29 -0800
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
On 11/18/2010 02:08 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:57:08 +0100, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: >> On Nov 16, 2010, at 3:43 pm, fantasai wrote: >>> 2D Transforms >>> ------------- >>> >>> - RESOLVED: Any Transforms tests that can be reftests must be reftests. >> >> Was there a reason for this resolution to be specific to 2D Transforms, >> or should be applied more generally to any test >> suites that are created henceforth? > > When I raised this I was hoping we could adopt this for all test suites. > If they can be automated with JavaScript (as e.g. the > Media Queries Test Suite is) that would be even better. I don't recall if we have a formal resolution on it or not, but I'm pretty sure the policy for CSS3 already is "self-describing reftest, if possible", with exceptions for non-layout technology like MQ. That's how I'm interpreting policy, anyway. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 19 November 2010 07:58:39 UTC