- From: Makoto Kato <makoto.kt@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:15:28 +0900
- To: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org CSS" <www-style@w3.org>
Hi, Murata-san. This is CSS WG, not EPUB WG. Although CSS writing-mode is necessary for some languages, I think that we need more discussions for agreed specification. If EPUB wants something like the XSL specification, EPUB should use it instead of CSS. Also, I look that your claim is a Japanese government / business issue. I think that CSS is for Web. Web isn't the replacement of paper media. Of course, it is wonderful that EPUB uses CSS. You should do the productive discussion instead of sending claim mail. -- Makoto Kato On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:38 AM, MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Some Japanese now point out that the CSS writing modes is not > yet a FPWD even after the TPAC, and claim that Japan should not > use CSS writing modes for E-book but rather use XMDF, DotBook > (should not be confused with DocBook), or an upcoming "Japanese > intermediate format" (supported by the Japanese government as a > candidate for an IEC standard) in the near future at least. > > Cheers, > Makoto > > -- -- Makoto Kato <m_kato@ga2.so-net.ne.jp>
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2010 10:56:56 UTC