- From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:14:46 -0800
- To: Kevin Ar18 <kevinar18@hotmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Hi Kevin, Thanks for reviewing this CSS3 UI editor's draft feature and providing early feedback - really appreciate it. I've collected your list in the issues list and will expand and follow-up there. Feel free to add more there as well. http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css3-ui Thanks, Tantek On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:47, Kevin Ar18 <kevinar18@hotmail.com> wrote: > In reference to the following section: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-ui/#pointer-events > > I figured I would polish up some test cases based on what was put in the > CSS3 spec. However, there are a number of points of confusion that I want > to clear up. > > First, off, these are only my views on the issue... so I really need some > input to see if my reasoning is wrong or not. > Second, I apologize for the the aggressive sounding tone; I really don't > mean it to be that way ... and I appreciate the effort people put into > working out the details ... however, I just want to get to the heart of the > issue quickly, so I really hope the original author(s) won't feel offended > by it. :) > > > Issue 1. As far as I can tell, the spec does not address the most important > issue: whether the svg rectangle should trigger pointer-events. > There was considerable discussion over this very topic in the svg mailing > list as well as in various meetings. The conclusion: it was decided that > the topmost/base svg tag should not trigger pointer events -- it should not > act like an invisible rectangular object that you can click on. > The relevant discussion is listed here: > http://www.w3.org/2010/09/27-fx-minutes.html#action04 under the section: > "'pointer-events' and (event) transparency" > > Sounds fine... but... I do not see that mentioned in the spec ... which > means is this issue still undecided? is it just an oversight? am I > mis-understanding something? > > > Issue 2. Why even mention all the pointer-events properties for SVG when > they all mean the same thing for the svg tag: "none"? > * According to the SVG spec and the discussions, the svg tag never triggers > pointer events -- no matter what the "pointer-events" property is set to. > (There is one exception: the "boundingBox" property from SVGTiny) > * Thus, "pointer-events" has no effect on the svg tag; it only affects it's > children. (Again, "boundingBox" is the 1 exception.) > * Example: auto, none, all, visible, visiblePainted, visibleFill, > visibleStroke, painted, fill, stroke ..... do not affect the base svg tag in > any way; these properties are merely inherited by it's children. Note: > "auto" is the only property that is different. "auto" changes to > "visiblePainted". > > So, why even list many of the attributes like "visible", "visiblePainted", > "visibleFill", etc... when they have no effect? Or..., does this imply that > the CSS3 specs actual means something different? Do things like "visible" > and "visiblePainted" work differently than in SVG? Really, that is probably > the most imortant thing; does listing this info in the spec imply that there > is something different about it? > > Issue 3. There is no way to specify that the svg tag should trigger events. > Based on the points 1 & 2, none of the current properties allow the svg tag > to trigger events. I can forsee this being a pretty big issue when you > specifically want to treat the svg element like a drawing surface and > capture mouse events. > > SVG Tiny added another property called "boundingBox" > (http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/interact.html#PointerEventsProperty) Should > a property like this be added to the CSS3 specs to allow the svg tag to > trigger events? > -- http://tantek.com/ - I made an HTML5 tutorial! http://tantek.com/html5
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 23:16:07 UTC