- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 10:32:51 +0000
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > > >> On Nov 13, 2010, at 4:19 PM, "Andrew Fedoniouk" >> <andrew.fedoniouk@live.com> wrote: >> >>> Usually browser window is open in full. Anyone can create inside >>> something that looks like standard OS window. >> >> I guess you don't use Mac, then. I sometimes wonder why Microsoft >> didn't name their OS "fullscreens", since so many of it's users.seem I very rarely use Windows windows maximised. Application specifiers often design on a full windows basis because they think their application should be considered so important that no-one would want to have anything else open at the same time. >> to distain the concept of multiple overlapping windows. In my own >> usage, I very often have popup minus that extend outside the window. >> > > I do not understand your concerns then, sorry. > > On iPhone OS you can create web page/app that will span full screen > without even traces of browser's chrome. > And there you can mimic any standard elements of the OS so they will be > indistinguishable from native application. > What problem do you see with that? The obvious security one - it's a phisher's charter. Also, it assumes that you have accounted for every OSes user interface, and, in the case of X-Windows, at least, every possible window manager and user configuration of such. That includes the ones not yet released. Mimicing OS controls, rather than using them directly, is a very common want imposed on designers, but it is bad user interface practice. > > -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Sunday, 14 November 2010 10:33:23 UTC