- From: Lev Solntsev <greli@mail.ru>
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 11:32:18 +0300
- To: www-style@w3.org
Lee Kowalkowski <lee.kowalkowski@googlemail.com> писал(а) в своём письме Tue, 09 Nov 2010 01:05:14 +0300: > No, it makes it a compromise. Because for some reason, > background-position was never implemented as its individual > properties, unlike margin with -top -right -bottom -left, etc, etc... Speaking of this it makes sense to introduce background-position-top, -left, -right and -bottom instead of old -x and -y. I have just thought about the use case: imagine you have a some image positioned like bullet and want place it left for ltr languages and right for rtl. Then you have only to change background-position horizontal position and you not actually need to change vertical one. The latter may vary due to different issues.
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 08:32:06 UTC