- From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:35:26 +0100
- To: "Sylvain Galineau" <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:54:31 +0100, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: > I stand correct on overflow:scroll. My bad. > > But why would it be any different with overflow:auto ? To oversimplify, > my expectation is that transforms are applied to the laid-out element > before it's painted. So if the element does not cause overflow before > transform, I expect it to look the same after transform whether or not > the transform is causing the parent to overflow. Hm, OK, auto gets a bit weird. Actually, something quite similar happens with position: relative (in Chrome, Firefox, IE and Opera). More spec detail would definitely be good. -- Øyvind Stenhaug Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2010 16:34:06 UTC