- From: Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>
- Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:45:45 +1100
- To: www-style@w3.org
# Unlike margin properties, values for padding values cannot be negative. # Like margin properties, percentage values for padding properties refer # to the width of the generated box's containing block. In the case that the containing block's width is negative, it isn't clear whether this means that percentages aren't allowed to be negative (i.e. whether a negative percentage is considered an illegal value regardless of whether or not the containing block width is positive), or the used value isn't allowed to be negative, or both. If the used value isn't allowed to be negative, then there needs to be some text saying what to do if the percentage calculation does give a negative answer (as might happen even if the percentage is a positive percentage if the containing block width is negative), for example stating that the used value is zero in this case (similar to 'min-width' and 'max-width'). (My best reading of the existing text is that it should be treated as an illegal value if the percentage calculation result is negative, though this would be unfortunate, as it means that the cascade resolution needs knowledge of the width of the containing block to know which declarations should be discarded as illegal and thus know to retain other declarations.) (Update: I've now tested a few user agents, but none had particularly reasonable/consistent/conforming behaviour for the one case I'm aware of that can give a negative containing block width. See post entitled "[CSS21] negative containing block width and percentages".) 'min-width' and 'max-width' (§10.4) have a similar issue in that the text says # Negative values for 'min-width' and 'max-width' are illegal. but isn't completely clear whether negative percentages are illegal. If they are to be considered illegal, then I would suggest explicitly adding "(including negative percentage values)". pjrm.
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2010 06:47:11 UTC