- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 17:20:00 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Nov 1, 2010, at 4:10 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree. I believe that 95% of all cases can be addressed with one of > two things: an angle, or a box-cardinal direction (two horizontal, two > vertical, four corner-to-corner). My hunch is that in actual usage, it will be more like 97%-98% solvable as simple angles only, with the vast majority being horizontal or vertical, less than 10% diagonal (but still fixed direction), and only 2-3% needing the stretchable diagonal behavior. Of course, I AM just pulling these numbers out of the air, but I'm also thinking of designs in print and Web that I've worked on myself and seen from others. > The specific idea I came up with lets us address both of those in a > consistent way together, such that you can always interpolate between > the two. You can't do that with an explicit switch between two > different behaviors. I wonder how important that will be.
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2010 00:21:06 UTC