- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 13:42:13 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On May 28, 2010, at 11:12 AM, Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com> wrote: > >> Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> No, I agree. But that's why I mentioned 'margin: calc(1fl + 2px)', >>> which would be a 2px hard lower boundary, supposing that '1fl' might >>> typically be much more than that, but capping it at 2px in case it >>> wasn't. >> >> Wait, what? Weren't you just arguing for '1fl' to be allowed to be >> negative? > > Yes, but margin can't be less than zero. I guess I was thinking margin would > hit zero, not go any lower, and then the 2px would be added back, but you're > right, that doesn't really make mathmatical sense. Margin can be less than zero. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 28 May 2010 20:43:08 UTC