Re: [flex-units] unit abbreviations and the flex()

Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, I agree. But that's why I mentioned 'margin: calc(1fl + 2px)',
> which would be a 2px hard lower boundary, supposing that '1fl' might
> typically be much more than that, but capping it at 2px in case it
> wasn't.

Wait, what?  Weren't you just arguing for '1fl' to be allowed to be
negative?

zw

Received on Friday, 28 May 2010 18:13:12 UTC