W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2010

Re: Flexbox Draft, with pictures!

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 10:07:20 -0700
Cc: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A0BDE42D-DD96-4F6A-98A9-9B58580F1B24@gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>

On May 25, 2010, at 10:14 PM, Brad Kemper wrote:

>> Regardless, I think additive flexing vs. replacement flexing is a key distinction here, and it would be good to make both easy to specify.  Having to do width: calc(fit-to-content + 1fl) just to do the former seems gross.  
> Why not this: 
> 'width:1fl;  min-width: fit-to-content;'

So, I'll be the first to admit I might be missing something. Is there any reason why it can't be this simple, instead of having to employ 'calc()'?
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 17:07:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:46 UTC