- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 10:07:20 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On May 25, 2010, at 10:14 PM, Brad Kemper wrote: >> Regardless, I think additive flexing vs. replacement flexing is a key distinction here, and it would be good to make both easy to specify. Having to do width: calc(fit-to-content + 1fl) just to do the former seems gross. > > Why not this: > > 'width:1fl; min-width: fit-to-content;' So, I'll be the first to admit I might be missing something. Is there any reason why it can't be this simple, instead of having to employ 'calc()'?
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 17:07:55 UTC