On Wed, 26 May 2010 10:03:25 +0200, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote: > Actually "flex" is not a feature of flex-box. It is something that has > effect on blocks when they are inside a flex-box. Although I don't > support extending "flex unit" to CSS in general, it seems reasonable > that "flex" has a meaning elsewhere, e.g. within a flexible grid. That > is probably how the naming got transferred from XUL to begin with. > > A good name would express the way the container positions its children > along one dimention. E.g. "stack". I know that has a different meaning > in XUL but this is not XUL... I wouldn't have a problem with re-using the flex naming for whenever we do "2D flexbox". -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 08:12:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:46 UTC